A Tangled Web
Rhetoric aside, need to get to bottom of 'Washington outsider's' uranium claim
Originally printed Sunday, July 20, 2003
Times-Record News, Wichita Falls, Texas
With all the rhetoric aside, what have we learned this past week?
George W. Bush ran for president as a self-professed "outsider" to Washington. I don't know if I would be proud of that moniker, knowing that my own father had been a president, vice-president, director of the CIA, ambassador to Beijing, permanent U.S. representative to the U.N., a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and had actually served in the armed forces. And that my grandfather had been a senator.
Despite those ties to Washington, it was a claim he made. And a lot of the voters fell for it. This is because it was fashionable in the late 1990's to assign the same venom to "them Washington types" that we once held in reserve for "them Commie reds."
The intelligence gaffe, the unwillingness to utilize any diplomacy, the laughable (if you can keep from crying) relaxations on environmental policies, the assault on the Bill of Rights perpetrated by an ingeniously named USA Patriot Act, and a tax scheme with ramifications we won't fully realize until he is not elected, again. I guess we have learned maybe it is OK to be one of "them Washington types."
I may not like the fact that my mechanic is going to charge me $900 to fix my A/C in my car, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask my dry cleaner to give it a shot.
So, what about the slip up in intelligence? Direct translation: LIE. Well, at least I hope it is a lie. Not for the politicization of the matter, but so that I might retain some confidence in an intelligence community that could let Sept. 11 happen.
If the president didn't lie, then we are at Square 1. We have intelligence agencies that have none. However, if he lied, as all evidence is suggesting, then perhaps they are capable of learning from past mistakes and they were working to keep us safe. If he lied, he has led us, unnecesarily, into a war and subsequent period of rebuilding that has destabilized the region and put the sons and daughters of our nation in harm's way. If he lied, then there are 150-plus U.S. soldiers' and countless Iraqi citizens' lives on his head. If he lied, he is guilty of a high crime and misdemeanor.
"But what evidence is suggesting he lied?", I'm sure you are asking, right? Well the lap dog journalistic community has decided it doesn't like the bones being handed it by this administration. They are, for the first time since Sept. 11, doing their jobs.
Political speeches are being taken apart word by word. Although Bush's handlers are stating that the uranium quote was a single component in our rush to war, we now know that the U.N. Inspections teams and the IAEA, led by Hans Blix and Mohammed El Baradai, respectively, effectively debunked all of our other components, prior to our attack.
On Wednesday of this past week, the FBI made public an investigation into this matter. With any luck, we'll soon be able to ask Bush where his buck stops.